Pixie-faced
Victoria's Secret model Miranda Kerr would seem to be very popular,
right? I mean, we know her name, she's married to Orlando Bloom, and
she's all over your little brother's walls. And yet, Us
Weekly is
claiming that Kerr has not had her VS contract renewed, because she
"has a difficult reputation" and "was not a big
seller." Which, hm, how do they measure that? Which model sells,
I mean. Seems complicated.
Maybe that's Victoria's secret. Anyway,
the important distinction to make here is that we're really talking
about whether or not Miranda Kerr is still a Victoria's Secret Angel,
meaning one of the top ambassadors of the brand. Her $1 million
contract for that was supposedly not renewed, but VS could still use
her for the catalogues or have her stand outside one of the stores in
some shopping mall somewhere trying to lure people in. So she's not
necessarily done with the brand forever, it's just that she's not an
Angel anymore. So says Us
Weekly,
anyway. Vogue is
reporting that no such thing has happened.
They spoke to VS's chief
marketing officer, as if he would know anything, who said, "Miranda
Kerr is one of the best models in the history of the business — and
easily one of the most popular." He continued, "While her
international commitments have kept her away from us more than we'd
like over the past few years, she will always be an Angel to me."
OK, but what about actually being
an Angel?? We need to know! He explained: "We have no plans to
stop working with her. In fact, I've already invited her to walk the
runway in this year's fashion show and, happily, she's agreed."
Huh. OK. So she'll walk in this year's show, I guess as an Angel, but
he didn't really that
she will be an Angel in the future.
So it's possible, in a weird way,
that both UsWeekly and Vogue are
right. Gray areas exist in complicated matters like this one. I mean,
this is a big deal. Who's an Angel, who's not an Angel? Who's wearing
what underpants at what televised underpants show? Can you imagine
anything more important? I certainly can't. Your little brother
certainly doesn't want to. This is about as big as it gets, Miranda
Kerr's underpants contract and the status of her glitzy Angel wings.[NYT, oh wait, no, sorry, UsWeekly & Vogue]
In
some sort of survey of creeps and weirdos, Jennifer Lawrence was
named the top celebrity that people want to see in a sex tape. Out of
every celebrity, all the celebrities, these people have the "most
interest in watching or buying" a J.Laws sex video. You know who
came in second? Anne Hathaway. Yup. Anne Hathaway. What is America
anymore, huh? Look, I get why a Jennifer Lawrence sex tape would be
"hot" or whatever, but come on.
Is that really the
point of a celebrity sex tape? I feel like it's more curiosity than
anything else, isn't it? Like, don't you think an AnnetteBening/Warren Beatty sex tape would be more interesting? I don't
know. What would an Ann Curry sex tape look like? I'm not saying
anyone should go film those things and sell them to Vivid, but it
just seems awfully boring of
people to be like "I want the tape with Katniss." Ho hum.
Well, whatever. To each their own. Keep dreaming of that Jennifer
Lawrence sex tape all you want.
Source:
theatlanticwire
Are
you an Optometrist??? Need a software? Visit VisualEyes
Bathroom
renovation?? Need some help? Just visit Bathmaster
.jpg)
0 comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.