"Affluenza,"
the affliction cited by a psychologist to argue that a North Texas
teenager from a wealthy family should not be sent to prison for
killing four pedestrians while driving drunk, is not a recognized
diagnosis and should not be used to justify bad behavior, experts
said Thursday.
A
judge's decision to give 16-year-old Ethan Couch 10 years of
probation for the fatal accident sparked outrage from relatives of
those killed and has led to questions about the defense strategy. A
psychologist testified in Couch's trial in a Fort Worth juvenile
court that as a result of "affluenza," the boy should not
receive the maximum 20-year prison sentence prosecutors were seeking.
The
term "affluenza" was popularized in the late 1990s by
Jessie O'Neill, the granddaughter of a past president of General
Motors, when she wrote the book "The Golden Ghetto: The
Psychology of Affluence." It has since been used to describe a
condition in which children — generally from richer families —
have a sense of entitlement, are irresponsible, make excuses for poor
behavior, and sometimes dabble in drugs and alcohol, explained Dr.
Gary Buffone, a Jacksonville, Fla., psychologist who does family
wealth advising.
But
Buffone said in a telephone interview Thursday that the term wasn't
meant to be used as a defense in a criminal trial or to justify such
behavior.
Source:
usatoday
Are
you an Optometrist???
Need a optometry
software? Visit Visual-Eyes
0 comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.