There
is a saying in hockey that always sprouts at this time of year: "Your
best players need to be your best players."
That
is to say, if you have a team with Wayne
Gretzky, chances are,
you'll need Gretzky to be your best player to win a Stanley
Cup. If some
fourth-line guy who has fewer teeth than fingers is playing better
than Gretzky, that's not a good sign.
And
it makes sense. On the Pittsburgh
Penguins, there is no
doubt that Sidney
Crosby and EvgeniMalkin are the two celestial lights around which that constellation
of stars swirls. Reggie Jackson might say their sticks
stir the drink.
Well,
when the Penguins were swept by the Boston
Bruins last
round, they were dreadful.
And
now, with the Stanley Cup final tied at 1-1 heading to Boston Monday
night, the Chicago
Blackhawks must
wonder if Superman is still stuck in his phone booth.Patrick
Kane,
who once wore a cape during the shootout competition on all-star
weekend, has seemed to shrink before the Big Bad Bruins, skirting on
the edges of play, pushed to the areas of the ice where there is
least resistance – and where he is very little threat.
MarianHossa,
too, has been largely anonymous so far. The Blackhawks need both to
be among their best players over the next (potentially) five games.
But
then, what about the Bruins?
On
one hand, the Bruins' best players have been their best players –
emphatically – this postseason. The Bruins' first line of David
Krejci, Milan
Lucic,
and Nathan Horton has been the best line so far in these playoffs,
and by some distance. Lucic scored twice in Game 1 of the final.
But
that, in itself, is telling. None of that threesome would likely even
be on the Penguins first line. For the Blackhawks, arguably at least
four forwards are all bigger offensive stars than any of the Bruins
top 3 – Kane, Hossa, Jonathan
Toews,
and Patrick Sharp.
And
that, if anything, is the legacy of what one might call the National
Hockey League's
"Bruins Era," whether or not the Bruins win this cup. Since
the Bruins won the Stanley Cup in 2011, team has trumped talent,
steadiness has trumped star power. And this series is shaping up no
different.
TheBruins are essentially a team with two second lines and two third
lines. Their best forward, Patrice Bergeron, is best known for
playing defense. Their leading point-scorer in the regular season,
Brad Marchand, is a second-line winger best knowing for annoying
opposing players past endurance.
They
are hockey's embodiment of the bell curve: one great goaltender
(Tuukka Rask), one great defenseman (Zdeno Chara), and everyone else
bunched together in the middle – none spectacular, none awful. If
competence can be an art form, the Bruins are its Picasso.
In
Game 2 Saturday night, the Bruins third line was its best, creating
both goals in the Bruins' 2-1 overtime win. Why? Because Bruins
coach Claude
Julien moved
up fourth-liner Daniel Paille. On many teams, fourth-liners are
ballast – fists on skates that bump and bruise to avoid being sent
back down to the Charlotte Checkers or Grand Rapids Griffins in the
minors. The idea of improving the team by moving a fourth-liner up
the pecking order would be preposterous.
Then
again, they're all sitting at home now.
Coach Julien was spot on in his news conference after Game 2: The top
forward lines always draw an opponent's top defensive pairing, with
the result of each often canceling the other out. In the toughest
games, where every square inch of the ice is contested – as this
series has been – that can leave the third and fourth lines to do
the damage.
And
make no mistake, that is a major reason the Blackhawks are here, too.
Put aside Toews and Kane and Hossa and they still have a positively
Bruinian supporting cast. In Game 1, the Blackhawks' third and fourth
lines accounted for goals 2, 3, and 4 of Chicago's 4-3 triple
overtime win. In Game 2, the Blackhawks' fourth line was by far their
most dangerous when the game was in the balance.
It
was the same last year, when the Los Angeles Kings won the cup by
being steadily unspectacular.
Now,
should the Penguins offload Sidney Crosby? Does today's NHL have no
room for superstars?
No.
But to win the Stanley Cup, it seems, they're no longer a necessity.
Source:
csmonitor.com
Are
you an Optometrist??? Need a software? Visit VisualEyes
Bathroom
renovation?? Need some help? Just visit Bathmaster
0 comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.